GeForce GTX 675M vs GTX 1080 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and GeForce GTX 675M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
34.77
+610%

GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms GTX 675M by a whopping 610% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.00no data
Power efficiency16.283.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP104GF114
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1607 MHz620 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.439.68
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPS0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s96.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Mobile 34.77
+610%
GTX 675M 4.90

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Mobile 28527
+786%
GTX 675M 3218

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1080 Mobile 48874
+231%
GTX 675M 14756

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Mobile 21394
+818%
GTX 675M 2331

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Mobile 126690
+602%
GTX 675M 18056

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 1080 Mobile 225
+549%
GTX 675M 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+525%
48
−525%
Full HD116
+142%
48
−142%
1440p73
+630%
10−12
−630%
4K56
+700%
7−8
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.31no data
1440p6.85no data
4K8.93no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+555%
10−12
−555%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Battlefield 5 115
+505%
18−20
−505%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+555%
10−12
−555%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Far Cry 5 91
+600%
12−14
−600%
Fortnite 143
+411%
27−30
−411%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+391%
21−24
−391%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+870%
10−11
−870%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+633%
18−20
−633%
Valorant 188
+219%
55−60
−219%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Battlefield 5 112
+489%
18−20
−489%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+555%
10−12
−555%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+172%
102
−172%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Dota 2 130−140
+245%
40−45
−245%
Far Cry 5 117
+800%
12−14
−800%
Fortnite 201
+618%
27−30
−618%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+382%
21−24
−382%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+870%
10−11
−870%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+644%
16−18
−644%
Metro Exodus 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+539%
18−20
−539%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+992%
12−14
−992%
Valorant 186
+215%
55−60
−215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+437%
18−20
−437%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+555%
10−12
−555%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Dota 2 120
+200%
40−45
−200%
Far Cry 5 108
+731%
12−14
−731%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+364%
21−24
−364%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+870%
10−11
−870%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
+406%
18−20
−406%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+469%
12−14
−469%
Valorant 137
+132%
55−60
−132%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150
+436%
27−30
−436%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+531%
35−40
−531%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Metro Exodus 44
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+430%
30−35
−430%
Valorant 183
+252%
50−55
−252%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 86
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Far Cry 5 74
+722%
9−10
−722%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+691%
10−12
−691%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+757%
7−8
−757%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 88
+878%
9−10
−878%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+375%
16−18
−375%
Metro Exodus 27
+800%
3−4
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 0−1
Valorant 178
+642%
24−27
−642%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 95−100
+519%
16−18
−519%
Far Cry 5 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+917%
6−7
−917%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+560%
5−6
−560%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
+740%
5−6
−740%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and GTX 675M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 525% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 142% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 630% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 5100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.77 4.90
Recency 15 August 2016 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 609.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 675M, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 337 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile or GeForce GTX 675M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.