CMP 40HX vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1050 Mobile 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 Max-Q 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Max-Q 1060 Mobile 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 1070 Mobile 1070 Max-Q 1070 SLI Mobile 1080 Mobile 1080 Max-Q 1080 SLI Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX CMP 40HX CMP 50HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 T1000 T400 T600 Tesla T4 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile with CMP 40HX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
32.82
+54.7%

GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms CMP 40HX by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.5910.30
Power efficiency16.588.69
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)25 February 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 42% better value for money than CMP 40HX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602304
Core clock speed1607 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt185 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.4237.6
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPS7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+62.9%
70−75
−62.9%
1440p71
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
4K55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.39
+128%
9.99
−128%
1440p7.04
+121%
15.53
−121%
4K9.09
+120%
19.97
−120%
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 128% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 121% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 120% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+57.5%
120−130
−57.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Sons of the Forest 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 115
+64.3%
70−75
−64.3%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+57.5%
120−130
−57.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Far Cry 5 91
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Fortnite 143
+58.9%
90−95
−58.9%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+66.2%
65−70
−66.2%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+61.5%
65−70
−61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+57.6%
85−90
−57.6%
Sons of the Forest 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Valorant 188
+56.7%
120−130
−56.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+60%
70−75
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+57.5%
120−130
−57.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+63.5%
170−180
−63.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Dota 2 130−140
+63.5%
85−90
−63.5%
Far Cry 5 117
+56%
75−80
−56%
Fortnite 201
+67.5%
120−130
−67.5%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+63.1%
65−70
−63.1%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+61.5%
65−70
−61.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+58.7%
75−80
−58.7%
Metro Exodus 73
+62.2%
45−50
−62.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+64.3%
70−75
−64.3%
Sons of the Forest 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+57.8%
90−95
−57.8%
Valorant 186
+55%
120−130
−55%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+56.9%
65−70
−56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Dota 2 120
+60%
75−80
−60%
Far Cry 5 108
+66.2%
65−70
−66.2%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+56.9%
65−70
−56.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Sons of the Forest 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Valorant 137
+61.2%
85−90
−61.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150
+57.9%
95−100
−57.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+60%
50−55
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+65.7%
140−150
−65.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Metro Exodus 44
+63%
27−30
−63%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
−59.1%
Valorant 183
+66.4%
110−120
−66.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 86
+56.4%
55−60
−56.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Far Cry 5 74
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+58.2%
55−60
−58.2%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 88
+60%
55−60
−60%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Metro Exodus 27
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+70%
30−33
−70%
Valorant 178
+61.8%
110−120
−61.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 100−105
+66.7%
60−65
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 40
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Sons of the Forest 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and CMP 40HX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 63% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 58% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 57% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.82 21.21
Recency 15 August 2016 25 February 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 185 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 54.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 23.3% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 40HX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
NVS 280 SD NVIDIA NVS 280 SD
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 1070 SLI Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 1070 SLI Mobile
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile 1080 Mobile
NVS 5100M NVIDIA NVS 5100M
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile 1080 Mobile
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh NVIDIA 3050 Max-Q Refresh
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile 1080 Mobile
ATI HD 3450 AGP ATI HD 3450 AGP
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile 980 SLI Mobile
RX 7700 XT AMD RX 7700 XT
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile 980 SLI Mobile
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
vs
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
GTX 980 Mobile GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 370 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 58 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile or CMP 40HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.