Radeon Vega 3 Efficient vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69not rated
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.28no data
Power efficiency13.33no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)26 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584192
Core clock speed1481 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.412.00
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs884
TMUs22412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount11 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width352 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1376 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2017 26 May 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 3 Efficient has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon Vega 3 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
Radeon Vega 3 Efficient

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9586 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 44 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.