GMA 3150 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking741547
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.17no data
Power efficiency13.14no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGP102Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358416
Core clock speed1481 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt13 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.40.8
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs881
TMUs2242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount11 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width352 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1376 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18587
+929250%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129no data
1440p84no data
4K67no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.42no data
1440p8.32no data
4K10.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140 no data
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140 no data
Battlefield 5 166 no data
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 120 no data
Fortnite 190−200 no data
Forza Horizon 4 147 no data
Forza Horizon 5 130−140 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125 no data
Valorant 250−260 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140 no data
Battlefield 5 154 no data
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Dota 2 133 no data
Far Cry 5 117 no data
Fortnite 203 no data
Forza Horizon 4 145 no data
Forza Horizon 5 130−140 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 120 no data
Metro Exodus 90 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170 no data
Valorant 250−260 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 149 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Dota 2 125 no data
Far Cry 5 109 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 no data
Valorant 179 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 163 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 84 no data
Metro Exodus 56 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 280−290 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 118 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 97 no data
Forza Horizon 4 102 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 98 no data
Metro Exodus 35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 no data
Valorant 260−270 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 125 no data
Far Cry 5 55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 51 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2017 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10786 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 142 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.