Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
35.02

6650M XT outperforms 1080 SLI Mobile by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking163113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.19
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLINavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202048
Core clock speed1556 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data309.2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.896 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
−9.5%
150−160
+9.5%
4K95
−15.8%
110−120
+15.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−14.1%
220−230
+14.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−19.8%
95−100
+19.8%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 90−95
−21.5%
110−120
+21.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
−9.6%
130−140
+9.6%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−14.1%
220−230
+14.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−19.8%
95−100
+19.8%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−14.9%
130−140
+14.9%
Fortnite 150−160
−13.5%
170−180
+13.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−16.1%
150−160
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−12%
150−160
+12%
Valorant 210−220
−10.8%
230−240
+10.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
−9.6%
130−140
+9.6%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
−14.1%
220−230
+14.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−0.4%
270−280
+0.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−19.8%
95−100
+19.8%
Dota 2 140−150
−3.5%
140−150
+3.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−14.9%
130−140
+14.9%
Fortnite 150−160
−13.5%
170−180
+13.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−16.1%
150−160
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−10.7%
130−140
+10.7%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−19.3%
95−100
+19.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−12%
150−160
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+20.7%
150−160
−20.7%
Valorant 210−220
−10.8%
230−240
+10.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
−9.6%
130−140
+9.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−19.8%
95−100
+19.8%
Dota 2 140−150
−3.5%
140−150
+3.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−14.9%
130−140
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−16.1%
150−160
+16.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−12%
150−160
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
−30.4%
150−160
+30.4%
Valorant 210−220
−10.8%
230−240
+10.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
−13.5%
170−180
+13.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−23.3%
100−110
+23.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−16.9%
290−300
+16.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−19.4%
85−90
+19.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−19.6%
60−65
+19.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
−8.5%
260−270
+8.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
−13%
100−110
+13%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−22.5%
45−50
+22.5%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−18.8%
100−110
+18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−20.2%
110−120
+20.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−20%
45−50
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−22.7%
90−95
+22.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−18.8%
35−40
+18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%
Valorant 210−220
−16.2%
250−260
+16.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−20%
45−50
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−27.8%
21−24
+27.8%
Dota 2 100−110
−10.6%
110−120
+10.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−21.2%
80−85
+21.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−28.9%
55−60
+28.9%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 9% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M XT is 16% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 30% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 30% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile performs better in 2 tests (3%)
  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 57 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.02 40.82
Recency 16 August 2016 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm

RX 6650M XT has a 17% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3245 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.