Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with Radeon Pro VII, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
35.89
+11.6%

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile outperforms Pro VII by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.67
Power efficiencyno data9.21
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203840
Core clock speed1556 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data408.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1024 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
+13.3%
120−130
−13.3%
4K96
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.83
4Kno data22.34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+12.9%
70−75
−12.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+13.3%
90−95
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+12.9%
70−75
−12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+11.9%
160−170
−11.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Valorant 140−150
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+13.3%
90−95
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+12.9%
70−75
−12.9%
Dota 2 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
Fortnite 160−170
+18.6%
140−150
−18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+11.9%
160−170
−11.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 116
+16%
100−105
−16%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 169
+12.7%
150−160
−12.7%
Valorant 140−150
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+11.6%
250−260
−11.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+13.3%
90−95
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+12.9%
70−75
−12.9%
Dota 2 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+11.9%
160−170
−11.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 83
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Valorant 140−150
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
World of Tanks 230−240
+13.3%
210−220
−13.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+12.6%
95−100
−12.6%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Valorant 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Dota 2 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169
+12.7%
150−160
−12.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Dota 2 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Fortnite 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Valorant 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and Pro VII compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 13% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.89 32.16
Recency 16 August 2016 13 May 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro VII, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro VII in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3234 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 1937 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.