Radeon R7 M465 vs GeForce GTX 1070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 with Radeon R7 M465, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
35.13
+1091%

GTX 1070 outperforms R7 M465 by a whopping 1091% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146785
Place by popularity32not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.29no data
Power efficiency16.16no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104Topaz
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 June 2016 (8 years ago)15 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920384
Core clock speed1506 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1125 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.027.00
Floating-point processing power6.463 TFLOPS0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs12024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s900 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 35.13
+1091%
R7 M465 2.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 13507
+1091%
R7 M465 1134

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 18255
+949%
R7 M465 1740

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 106934
+773%
R7 M465 12250

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+1178%
9−10
−1178%
1440p67
+1240%
5−6
−1240%
4K50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.30no data
1440p5.66no data
4K7.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Elden Ring 120−130
+1917%
6−7
−1917%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+1143%
7−8
−1143%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+1086%
14−16
−1086%
Metro Exodus 107
+2040%
5−6
−2040%
Red Dead Redemption 2 115
+945%
10−12
−945%
Valorant 140−150
+13900%
1−2
−13900%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 156
+2129%
7−8
−2129%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Dota 2 74
+825%
8−9
−825%
Elden Ring 120−130
+1917%
6−7
−1917%
Far Cry 5 75
+341%
16−18
−341%
Fortnite 150
+838%
16−18
−838%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+1086%
14−16
−1086%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+1288%
8−9
−1288%
Metro Exodus 75
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 225
+733%
27−30
−733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+291%
10−12
−291%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+373%
10−12
−373%
Valorant 140−150
+13900%
1−2
−13900%
World of Tanks 270−280
+425%
50−55
−425%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+957%
7−8
−957%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Dota 2 110−120
+1313%
8−9
−1313%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+441%
16−18
−441%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+1086%
14−16
−1086%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 94
+248%
27−30
−248%
Valorant 140−150
+13900%
1−2
−13900%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65 0−1
Elden Ring 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+733%
21−24
−733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
World of Tanks 220−230
+1020%
20−22
−1020%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1500%
7−8
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+9800%
1−2
−9800%
Metro Exodus 71
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
Valorant 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Dota 2 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Elden Ring 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+313%
14−16
−313%
Metro Exodus 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95
+1088%
8−9
−1088%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+313%
14−16
−313%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Dota 2 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1567%
3−4
−1567%
Fortnite 44
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Valorant 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%

This is how GTX 1070 and R7 M465 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is 1178% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 is 1240% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 is 1150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1070 is 13900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 surpassed R7 M465 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.13 2.95
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

GTX 1070 has a 1090.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M465 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop card while Radeon R7 M465 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8744 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.