Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 1070 Mobile
28.38
+8.7%

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 9% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking180190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money36.456.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN17E-G2N19E-Q1
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$389.99 no data
Current price$379 (1x MSRP)$2393
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 Mobile has 492% better value for money than RTX 3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481920
CUDA cores1920no data
Core clock speed1506 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt80 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate210.6198.7
Floating-point performance6,738 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready++
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Mobile 28.38
+8.7%
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 9% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1070 Mobile 11000
+8.7%
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 9% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 Mobile 34389
RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+46.3%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 46% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 Mobile 22576
+13.6%
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 Mobile 17237
+16.1%
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 Mobile 101041
+10.6%
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 11% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+5.8%
RTX 3000 Mobile 74

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 6% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+118%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 118% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+1413%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 1413% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+59.8%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 60% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+153%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 153% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
RTX 3000 Mobile 46
+15.6%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 16% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+1.5%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
RTX 3000 Mobile 12
+42.2%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 42% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+1.5%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+5.8%
RTX 3000 Mobile 74

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 6% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+59.5%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 60% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+118%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 118% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+1413%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 1413% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+153%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 153% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
RTX 3000 Mobile 46
+15.6%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 16% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 Mobile 8.3
RTX 3000 Mobile 11.8
+42.2%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile by 42% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+6.3%
95
−6.3%
1440p60
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
4K43
−105%
88
+105%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
−2.7%
77
+2.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+50%
45−50
−50%
Battlefield 5 122
+45.2%
80−85
−45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 107
+55.1%
65−70
−55.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 92
+35.3%
65−70
−35.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
−18.2%
91
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+37.2%
85−90
−37.2%
Hitman 3 85−90
+10.1%
75−80
−10.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 78
+39.3%
55−60
−39.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 76
+81%
40−45
−81%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
−16.3%
100
+16.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+22%
50−55
−22%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+9.7%
62
−9.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+26.1%
45−50
−26.1%
Battlefield 5 113
+34.5%
80−85
−34.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 92
+33.3%
65−70
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 92
+35.3%
65−70
−35.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
−16.2%
86
+16.2%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+33.7%
85−90
−33.7%
Hitman 3 85−90
+10.1%
75−80
−10.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 62
+10.7%
55−60
−10.7%
Metro Exodus 59
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 77
−9.1%
84
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
−0.9%
109
+0.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 53
+6%
50−55
−6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+43.6%
39
−43.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+8.7%
45−50
−8.7%
Battlefield 5 103
+22.6%
80−85
−22.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 87
+27.9%
65−70
−27.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 68
−13.2%
77
+13.2%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+12.8%
85−90
−12.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+7.1%
56
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
−19%
50−55
+19%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Hitman 3 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Metro Exodus 35
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+20%
20−22
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Battlefield 5 75
+29.3%
55−60
−29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Far Cry 5 61
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+40.7%
50−55
−40.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+12.5%
30−35
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+50%
20−22
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Metro Exodus 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Battlefield 5 41
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 31
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+40.5%
35−40
−40.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

This is how GTX 1070 Mobile and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 6.3% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 9.1% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 105% faster than GTX 1070 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1070 Mobile is 81% faster than the RTX 3000 Mobile.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 41.7% faster than the GTX 1070 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is ahead in 58 tests (85%)
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 10 tests (15%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 28.38 26.10
Recency 1 September 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 80 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 782 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 219 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.