FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile with FirePro M5100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
24.62
+424%

GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms M5100 by a whopping 424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210627
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.21no data
Power efficiency16.32no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGP104BVenus
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)16 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920640
Core clock speed1506 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate210.631.00
Floating-point processing power6.738 TFLOPS0.992 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 Mobile 24.62
+424%
FirePro M5100 4.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Mobile 11000
+423%
FirePro M5100 2102

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Mobile 22576
+661%
FirePro M5100 2967

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1070 Mobile 34389
+179%
FirePro M5100 12308

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Mobile 17237
+641%
FirePro M5100 2328

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 101041
+502%
FirePro M5100 16785

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+210%
FirePro M5100 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
+27.4%
FirePro M5100 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
FirePro M5100 29
+291%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
+210%
FirePro M5100 23

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
+127%
FirePro M5100 21

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
+410%
FirePro M5100 8

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
+408%
FirePro M5100 16

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
+1975%
FirePro M5100 0

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
+408%
FirePro M5100 16

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+210%
FirePro M5100 25

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
+211%
FirePro M5100 23

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
+27.4%
FirePro M5100 40

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
FirePro M5100 29
+291%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
+127%
FirePro M5100 21

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
+410%
FirePro M5100 8

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 1070 Mobile 8.3
+1975%
FirePro M5100 0.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100
+223%
31
−223%
1440p60
+500%
10−12
−500%
4K44
+450%
8−9
−450%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.90no data
1440p6.50no data
4K8.86no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+600%
21−24
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+490%
10−11
−490%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Battlefield 5 122
+481%
21−24
−481%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+600%
21−24
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+490%
10−11
−490%
Far Cry 5 92
+513%
14−16
−513%
Fortnite 151
+403%
30−33
−403%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+413%
21−24
−413%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+554%
12−14
−554%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 114
+470%
20−22
−470%
Valorant 166
+168%
60−65
−168%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Battlefield 5 113
+438%
21−24
−438%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+600%
21−24
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+206%
85−90
−206%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+490%
10−11
−490%
Dota 2 120−130
+198%
40−45
−198%
Far Cry 5 92
+513%
14−16
−513%
Fortnite 148
+393%
30−33
−393%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+400%
21−24
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+554%
12−14
−554%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
+411%
18−20
−411%
Metro Exodus 59
+490%
10−11
−490%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 107
+435%
20−22
−435%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
+671%
14−16
−671%
Valorant 156
+152%
60−65
−152%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+390%
21−24
−390%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+490%
10−11
−490%
Dota 2 120−130
+198%
40−45
−198%
Far Cry 5 87
+480%
14−16
−480%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+322%
21−24
−322%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79
+295%
20−22
−295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Valorant 112
+80.6%
60−65
−80.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 111
+270%
30−33
−270%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+379%
35−40
−379%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
Metro Exodus 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Valorant 154
+170%
55−60
−170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 61
+510%
10−11
−510%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+533%
12−14
−533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 73
+630%
10−11
−630%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Grand Theft Auto V 53
+212%
16−18
−212%
Metro Exodus 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Valorant 148
+469%
24−27
−469%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Dota 2 85−90
+372%
18−20
−372%
Far Cry 5 31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+643%
7−8
−643%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24
+380%
5−6
−380%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35
+600%
5−6
−600%

This is how GTX 1070 Mobile and FirePro M5100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 223% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 500% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 Mobile is 3800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 Mobile surpassed FirePro M5100 in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.62 4.70
Recency 15 August 2016 16 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

GTX 1070 Mobile has a 423.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M5100 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070
AMD FirePro M5100
FirePro M5100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 868 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 136 votes

Rate FirePro M5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile or FirePro M5100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.