Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Place in performance ranking	112	310
Place by popularity	73	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	32.23	8.90
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code name	Pascal GP104	GM204
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	2 November 2017 (6 years ago)	30 August 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$231 (0.6x MSRP)	$350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 Ti has 262% better value for money than Tesla M6.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2432	1536
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz	1180 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	255.8	113.3
Floating-point performance	8,186 gflops	3,625 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.3 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	6.1	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Ti 38.03
+134%

Tesla M6 16.27

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti outperforms Tesla M6 by 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1070 Ti 14686
+134%

Tesla M6 6284

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti outperforms Tesla M6 by 134% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120 +140%	50−55 −140%
1440p	80 +167%	30−35 −167%
4K	55 +162%	21−24 −162%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

150−160

+127%

65−70
−127%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +124%	65−70 −124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +127%	65−70 −127%
Battlefield 5	280−290 +128%	120−130 −128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +121%	75−80 −121%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +127%	65−70 −127%
Far Cry 5	230−240 +130%	100 −130%
Far Cry New Dawn	220−230 +132%	95−100 −132%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +105%	140−150 −105%
Hitman 3	180−190 +131%	75−80 −131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +127%	150−160 −127%
Metro Exodus	300−310 +117%	138 −117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	210−220 +128%	90−95 −128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +104%	140−150 −104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +132%	95−100 −132%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +124%	65−70 −124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +127%	65−70 −127%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +133%	60 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +121%	75−80 −121%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +127%	65−70 −127%
Far Cry 5	190−200 +132%	82 −132%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +127%	44 −127%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +105%	140−150 −105%
Hitman 3	180−190 +131%	75−80 −131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +127%	150−160 −127%
Metro Exodus	260−270 +132%	112 −132%
Red Dead Redemption 2	210−220 +128%	90−95 −128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +104%	140−150 −104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	220−230 +132%	95−100 −132%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +132%	95−100 −132%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 +122%	63 −122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +127%	65−70 −127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +121%	75−80 −121%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +127%	65−70 −127%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +120%	59 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +130%	100 −130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +127%	150−160 −127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +104%	140−150 −104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +122%	72 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +132%	95−100 −132%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

210−220

+128%

90−95
−128%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	180−190 +125%	80 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +122%	81 −122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +129%	48 −129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +126%	40−45 −126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +128%	55−60 −128%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +133%	30−33 −133%
Far Cry 5	170−180 +127%	75 −127%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +122%	81 −122%
Hitman 3	110−120 +124%	45−50 −124%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +132%	80−85 −132%
Metro Exodus	170−180 +124%	76 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +128%	90−95 −128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +122%	50−55 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +127%	30−35 −127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

150−160

+131%

65−70
−131%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +125%	40 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +129%	35 −129%
Hitman 3	70−75 +126%	30−35 −126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +129%	45−50 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +132%	28 −132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +113%	47 −113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +122%	27 −122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +117%	23 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +118%	55 −118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +129%	45−50 −129%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +126%	42 −126%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +111%	18−20 −111%