ATI Radeon 9200 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and Radeon 9200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
38.20
+381900%

GTX 1070 Ti outperforms ATI 9200 by a whopping 381900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1221525
Place by popularity70not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.41no data
Power efficiency14.640.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP104RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2432no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate255.81.000
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1524

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Ti 38.20
+381900%
ATI 9200 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti 14686
+489433%
ATI 9200 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD109-0−1
1440p71-0−1
4K55-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.66no data
1440p5.62no data
4K7.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 0−1
Elden Ring 130−140 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Metro Exodus 107 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1
Valorant 150−160 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 0−1
Dota 2 42 0−1
Elden Ring 130−140 0−1
Far Cry 5 75 0−1
Fortnite 160−170 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130 0−1
Metro Exodus 78 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140 0−1
Valorant 150−160 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 0−1
Dota 2 121 0−1
Far Cry 5 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200 0−1
Valorant 150−160 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75 0−1
Elden Ring 75−80 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 0−1
World of Tanks 240−250 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 0−1
Metro Exodus 76 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 0−1
Valorant 110−120 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 67 0−1
Elden Ring 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 67 0−1
Metro Exodus 25 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 92 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 105 0−1
Far Cry 5 55−60 0−1
Fortnite 45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Valorant 60−65 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.20 0.01
Recency 2 November 2017 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has a 381900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has 542.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3869 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 50 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.