Quadro 5010M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with Quadro 5010M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
32.89
+770%

GTX 1070 Ti outperforms 5010M by a whopping 770% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134687
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.48no data
Power efficiency14.503.00
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP104GF110
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2432384
Core clock speed1607 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate255.821.60
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs15248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 Ti 32.89
+770%
Quadro 5010M 3.78

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti 14694
+769%
Quadro 5010M 1691

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Ti 27503
+921%
Quadro 5010M 2693

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+689%
38
−689%
Full HD112
+89.8%
59
−89.8%
1440p72
+800%
8−9
−800%
4K54
+800%
6−7
−800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.56no data
1440p5.54no data
4K7.39no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+1163%
16−18
−1163%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+681%
16−18
−681%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+1163%
16−18
−1163%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Far Cry 5 114
+936%
10−12
−936%
Fortnite 150−160
+550%
24−27
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+621%
18−20
−621%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+729%
16−18
−729%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+681%
16−18
−681%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+1163%
16−18
−1163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+279%
70−75
−279%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Dota 2 127
+253%
35−40
−253%
Far Cry 5 108
+882%
10−12
−882%
Fortnite 150−160
+550%
24−27
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+621%
18−20
−621%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+823%
12−14
−823%
Metro Exodus 66
+843%
7−8
−843%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+729%
16−18
−729%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+908%
12−14
−908%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 111
+594%
16−18
−594%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Dota 2 121
+236%
35−40
−236%
Far Cry 5 102
+827%
10−12
−827%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+426%
18−20
−426%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+729%
16−18
−729%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+500%
12−14
−500%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 109
+354%
24−27
−354%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+1383%
6−7
−1383%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+690%
30−35
−690%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Metro Exodus 40
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+465%
30−35
−465%
Valorant 240−250
+459%
40−45
−459%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Far Cry 5 75
+971%
7−8
−971%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+710%
10−11
−710%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+983%
6−7
−983%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+800%
8−9
−800%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+319%
16−18
−319%
Metro Exodus 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+840%
5−6
−840%
Valorant 210−220
+924%
21−24
−924%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Dota 2 105
+708%
12−14
−708%
Far Cry 5 39
+875%
4−5
−875%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+1025%
4−5
−1025%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
+800%
4−5
−800%

This is how GTX 1070 Ti and Quadro 5010M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Ti is 689% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 90% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 800% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 Ti is 8200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 Ti surpassed Quadro 5010M in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.89 3.78
Recency 2 November 2017 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has a 770.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 5010M, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5010M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4046 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or Quadro 5010M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.