Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

Place in the ranking	122	117
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.76	22.44
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Pascal GP104 SLI	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	16 August 2016 (8 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	1792
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	2068 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz	2416 MHz
Number of transistors	14400 Million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	270.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 SLI 38.09

RX 6650M 39.02
+2.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 SLI 42691
+30%

RX 6650M 32846

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 SLI 34226
+33%

RX 6650M 25739

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	118 +1.7%	116 −1.7%
4K	60 +0%	60−65 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75−80 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −56.8%	127 +56.8%
Elden Ring	130−140 +92.8%	69 −92.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −1%	100−110 +1%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +52.8%	53 −52.8%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −21.3%	222 +21.3%
Metro Exodus	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
Valorant	150−160 −2.6%	150−160 +2.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −1%	100−110 +1%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +108%	39 −108%
Dota 2	58 +48.7%	39 −48.7%
Elden Ring	130−140 −3%	130−140 +3%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +109%	46 −109%
Fortnite	160−170 −1.8%	170−180 +1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −3.8%	190 +3.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	87 −40.2%	120−130 +40.2%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +179%	33 −179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −1%	200−210 +1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 −3%	130−140 +3%
Valorant	150−160 −2.6%	150−160 +2.6%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −1%	100−110 +1%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +153%	32 −153%
Dota 2	120−130 +20%	100 −20%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −1%	95−100 +1%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +9.6%	167 −9.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −1%	200−210 +1%
Valorant	150−160 −2.6%	150−160 +2.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Elden Ring	75−80 −2.6%	75−80 +2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
World of Tanks	240−250 −2.1%	240−250 +2.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Far Cry 5	120−130 −2.4%	120−130 +2.4%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −3.7%	110−120 +3.7%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −4.6%	65−70 +4.6%
Valorant	110−120 −3.4%	120−130 +3.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Dota 2	81 +5.2%	75−80 −5.2%
Elden Ring	35−40 −5.6%	35−40 +5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	81 +5.2%	75−80 −5.2%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −3.1%	30−35 +3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −2.4%	120−130 +2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	81 +5.2%	75−80 −5.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Dota 2	70−75 −4.1%	75−80 +4.1%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −3.6%	55−60 +3.6%
Fortnite	41 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
Valorant	60−65 −3.2%	60−65 +3.2%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

GTX 1070 SLI is 2% faster in 1080p
A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 SLI is 179% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6650M is 57% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1070 SLI is ahead in 12 tests (19%)
RX 6650M is ahead in 48 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.09	39.02
Recency	16 August 2016	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	120 Watt

RX 6650M has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Radeon RX 6650M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6650M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.