GeForce GT 710M vs GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with GeForce GT 710M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
37.19
+3511%

1070 SLI outperforms 710M by a whopping 3511% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1411148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.535.28
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGF117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)9 January 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384096
Core clock speed1506 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million585 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2976 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+3833%
3−4
−3833%
4K56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+4060%
5−6
−4060%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+4060%
5−6
−4060%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+3900%
3−4
−3900%
Fortnite 280
+3900%
7−8
−3900%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3525%
4−5
−3525%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+3867%
3−4
−3867%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+3625%
4−5
−3625%
Valorant 220−230
+3583%
6−7
−3583%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+4060%
5−6
−4060%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3886%
7−8
−3886%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Dota 2 140−150
+4667%
3−4
−4667%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+3900%
3−4
−3900%
Fortnite 176
+4300%
4−5
−4300%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3525%
4−5
−3525%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+3867%
3−4
−3867%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+4350%
2−3
−4350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+3625%
4−5
−3625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+3600%
3−4
−3600%
Valorant 220−230
+3583%
6−7
−3583%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Dota 2 140−150
+4667%
3−4
−4667%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+3900%
3−4
−3900%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3525%
4−5
−3525%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+3625%
4−5
−3625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Valorant 220−230
+3583%
6−7
−3583%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 123
+4000%
3−4
−4000%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+3671%
7−8
−3671%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4275%
4−5
−4275%
Valorant 250−260
+3514%
7−8
−3514%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+4750%
2−3
−4750%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+4450%
2−3
−4450%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5200%
2−3
−5200%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+4850%
2−3
−4850%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Valorant 230−240
+3733%
6−7
−3733%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Dota 2 100−110
+3533%
3−4
−3533%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 38
+3700%
1−2
−3700%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and GT 710M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 3833% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 5500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.19 1.03
Recency 16 August 2016 9 January 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 3510.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GT 710M, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 710M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 214 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 261 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or GeForce GT 710M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.