Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Quadro M1000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
36.24
+468%

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms M1000M by a whopping 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking102551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.18
Power efficiencyno data12.69
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed1443 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data31.78
Floating-point processing powerno data1.017 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan++
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 36.24
+468%
M1000M 6.38

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 42910
+915%
M1000M 4230

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 32969
+843%
M1000M 3498

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 152370
+551%
M1000M 23422

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 82
+303%
M1000M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 145
+373%
M1000M 31

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+254%
39
−254%
4K78
+500%
13
−500%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.15
4Kno data15.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+547%
30−35
−547%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+547%
30−35
−547%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+455%
21−24
−455%
Fortnite 160−170
+302%
40−45
−302%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+384%
30−35
−384%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+505%
20−22
−505%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+512%
24−27
−512%
Valorant 220−230
+203%
75−80
−203%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+547%
30−35
−547%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+148%
110−120
−148%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%
Dota 2 140−150
+167%
50−55
−167%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+455%
21−24
−455%
Fortnite 160−170
+302%
40−45
−302%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+384%
30−35
−384%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+505%
20−22
−505%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+416%
24−27
−416%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+615%
12−14
−615%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+308%
24−27
−308%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+784%
19
−784%
Valorant 220−230
+203%
75−80
−203%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%
Dota 2 140−150
+167%
50−55
−167%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+455%
21−24
−455%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+384%
30−35
−384%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+272%
24−27
−272%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+809%
11
−809%
Valorant 220−230
+203%
75−80
−203%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+302%
40−45
−302%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+818%
10−12
−818%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+408%
50−55
−408%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+778%
9−10
−778%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+714%
7−8
−714%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+349%
35−40
−349%
Valorant 250−260
+231%
75−80
−231%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+662%
12−14
−662%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+571%
14−16
−571%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+559%
16−18
−559%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+573%
10−12
−573%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+636%
14−16
−636%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+372%
18−20
−372%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+929%
7
−929%
Valorant 230−240
+558%
35−40
−558%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+933%
6−7
−933%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Dota 2 110−120
+344%
24−27
−344%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+573%
10−12
−573%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 37
+429%
7−8
−429%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and M1000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 254% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 SLI Mobile surpassed M1000M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.24 6.38
Recency 16 August 2016 18 August 2015
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 468% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 103 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 582 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile or Quadro M1000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.