Quadro K6000 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Quadro K6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
40.19
+109%

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms K6000 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking111301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.52
Power efficiencyno data6.51
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGK110B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)23 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,265

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962880
Core clock speed1443 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data216.5
Floating-point processing powerno data5.196 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan++
CUDA+3.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+112%
65−70
−112%
4K78
+123%
35−40
−123%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data81.00
4Kno data150.43

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+122%
100−105
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+109%
65−70
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+122%
100−105
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+115%
60−65
−115%
Fortnite 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+112%
60−65
−112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+111%
75−80
−111%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
Valorant 230−240
+112%
110−120
−112%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+109%
65−70
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+122%
100−105
−122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+114%
130−140
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Dota 2 140−150
+125%
65−70
−125%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+115%
60−65
−115%
Fortnite 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+112%
60−65
−112%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+118%
45−50
−118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+127%
45−50
−127%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+110%
80−85
−110%
Valorant 230−240
+112%
110−120
−112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+109%
65−70
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Dota 2 140−150
+125%
65−70
−125%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+115%
60−65
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+133%
40−45
−133%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+122%
45−50
−122%
Valorant 230−240
+112%
110−120
−112%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+131%
45−50
−131%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+118%
130−140
−118%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+137%
35−40
−137%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Valorant 260−270
+120%
120−130
−120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+120%
45−50
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Sons of the Forest 60−65
+110%
30−33
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+140%
30−33
−140%
Valorant 240−250
+125%
110−120
−125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Dota 2 110−120
+128%
50−55
−128%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and Quadro K6000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 112% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 123% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.19 19.22
Recency 16 August 2016 23 July 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 109.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 105 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 112 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile or Quadro K6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.