Tesla M60 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile with Tesla M60, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1060 Mobile
2016
6 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
19.28
+0.5%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking291292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.72no data
Power efficiency16.924.49
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP106GM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$237.11 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048 ×2
Core clock speed1506 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed1708 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate133.6150.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power4.275 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4864 ×2
TMUs80128 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB ×2
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s160.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
1440p47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
4K30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.44no data
1440p5.04no data
4K7.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Battlefield 5 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Counter-Strike 2 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Fortnite 177
+4.1%
170−180
−4.1%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+2%
100−105
−2%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
Valorant 136
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 222
+0.9%
220−230
−0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Dota 2 100−110
+6%
100−105
−6%
Far Cry 5 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Fortnite 105
+5%
100−105
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 5 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Metro Exodus 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 67
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Valorant 134
+3.1%
130−140
−3.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Dota 2 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Far Cry 5 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Valorant 72
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+3.1%
130−140
−3.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+6.3%
160−170
−6.3%
Valorant 133
+2.3%
130−140
−2.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Metro Exodus 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Valorant 117
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and Tesla M60 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.28 19.19
Recency 15 August 2016 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 1060 Mobile has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

Tesla M60, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile and Tesla M60.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla M60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1060
NVIDIA Tesla M60
Tesla M60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 596 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile or Tesla M60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.