Quadro FX 3700M vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	285	1067
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.75	0.02
Power efficiency	17.03	1.09
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GP106	G92
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	14 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$237.11	$925

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 138650% better value for money than FX 3700M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	128
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	133.6	35.20
Floating-point processing power	4.275 TFLOPS	0.352 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	80	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-HE

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 Mobile 19.75
+1560%

FX 3700M 1.19

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1060 Mobile 34127
+575%

FX 3700M 5053

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	68 +1600%	4−5 −1600%
1440p	44 +2100%	2−3 −2100%
4K	30 +2900%	1−2 −2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.49 +6532%	231.25 −6532%
1440p	5.39 +8483%	462.50 −8483%
4K	7.90 +11603%	925.00 −11603%

GTX 1060 Mobile has 6532% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1060 Mobile has 8483% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1060 Mobile has 11603% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40 +471%	7−8 −471%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 +825%	4−5 −825%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	63 +6200%	1−2 −6200%
Counter-Strike 2	31 +343%	7−8 −343%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +700%	4−5 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	106 +1225%	8−9 −1225%
Forza Horizon 5	67 +1575%	4−5 −1575%
Metro Exodus	69 +1625%	4−5 −1625%
Red Dead Redemption 2	74 +1133%	6−7 −1133%
Valorant	86 +1620%	5−6 −1620%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	73 +7200%	1−2 −7200%
Counter-Strike 2	27 +286%	7−8 −286%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 +550%	4−5 −550%
Dota 2	49 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
Far Cry 5	70 +600%	10−11 −600%
Fortnite	94 +1780%	5−6 −1780%
Forza Horizon 4	80 +900%	8−9 −900%
Forza Horizon 5	41 +1950%	2−3 −1950%
Grand Theft Auto V	74 +7300%	1−2 −7300%
Metro Exodus	49 +2350%	2−3 −2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	204 +1469%	12−14 −1469%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +350%	6−7 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +971%	7−8 −971%
Valorant	53 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
World of Tanks	222 +754%	24−27 −754%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	57 +5600%	1−2 −5600%
Counter-Strike 2	23 +229%	7−8 −229%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Dota 2	118 +11700%	1−2 −11700%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +560%	10−11 −560%
Forza Horizon 4	68 +750%	8−9 −750%
Forza Horizon 5	45 +2150%	2−3 −2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55 +323%	12−14 −323%
Valorant	72 +1700%	4−5 −1700%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +3100%	1−2 −3100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2329%	7−8 −2329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17	0−1
World of Tanks	130−140 +2133%	6−7 −2133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 +2000%	2−3 −2000%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +960%	5−6 −960%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +1600%	3−4 −1600%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35	0−1
Metro Exodus	45 +2150%	2−3 −2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +600%	4−5 −600%
Valorant	46 +667%	6−7 −667%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Dota 2	30−35 +127%	14−16 −127%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +120%	14−16 −120%
Metro Exodus	14	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	64 +2033%	3−4 −2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	11	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +120%	14−16 −120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Dota 2	30−35 +127%	14−16 −127%
Far Cry 5	24−27	0−1
Fortnite	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18	0−1
Valorant	23 +2200%	1−2 −2200%

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and FX 3700M compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is 1600% faster in 1080p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 2100% faster in 1440p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 2900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 11700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 40 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.75	1.19
Recency	15 August 2016	14 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	75 Watt

GTX 1060 Mobile has a 1559.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 3700M, on the other hand, has 6.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.