HD Graphics P3000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile with HD Graphics P3000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1060 Mobile
2016
6 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
17.96
+2621%

GTX 1060 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P3000 by a whopping 2621% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3011185
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.51no data
Power efficiency16.66no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameGP106Sandy Bridge GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$237.11 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed1506 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1708 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate133.616.20
Floating-point processing power4.275 TFLOPS0.2592 TFLOPS
ROPs482
TMUs8012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.53.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
1440p45
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
4K30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.49no data
1440p5.27no data
4K7.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 137
+2640%
5−6
−2640%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Hogwarts Legacy 48
+4700%
1−2
−4700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 96
+3100%
3−4
−3100%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+2650%
4−5
−2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry 5 75
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
Fortnite 177
+2850%
6−7
−2850%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+3300%
3−4
−3300%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 78
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Valorant 136
+3300%
4−5
−3300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Counter-Strike 2 73
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 222
+2675%
8−9
−2675%
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Dota 2 100−110
+3433%
3−4
−3433%
Far Cry 5 68
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Fortnite 105
+3400%
3−4
−3400%
Forza Horizon 4 91
+2933%
3−4
−2933%
Forza Horizon 5 61
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Hogwarts Legacy 27 0−1
Metro Exodus 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 67
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Valorant 134
+3250%
4−5
−3250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Cyberpunk 2077 23 0−1
Dota 2 118
+2850%
4−5
−2850%
Far Cry 5 64
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Hogwarts Legacy 21 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Valorant 72
+3500%
2−3
−3500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 81
+3950%
2−3
−3950%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+3250%
4−5
−3250%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Metro Exodus 23 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+2717%
6−7
−2717%
Valorant 133
+3225%
4−5
−3225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+5200%
1−2
−5200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50
+4900%
1−2
−4900%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 0−1
Valorant 117
+2825%
4−5
−2825%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
Far Cry 5 21 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 23 0−1

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and HD Graphics P3000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 3300% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 4400% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 2900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.96 0.66
Recency 15 August 2016 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 16 nm 32 nm

GTX 1060 Mobile has a 2621.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook card while HD Graphics P3000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1060
Intel HD Graphics P3000
HD Graphics P3000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 614 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 vote

Rate HD Graphics P3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile or HD Graphics P3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.