Radeon Pro 560X vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Place in the ranking	220	465
Place by popularity	23	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.35	no data
Power efficiency	14.34	8.79
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GP106	Polaris 21
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 August 2016 (8 years ago)	16 July 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	1024
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1004 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.0	64.26
Floating-point processing power	3.935 TFLOPS	2.056 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	72	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	250 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 3 GB 24.94
+161%

Pro 560X 9.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1060 3 GB 9588
+161%

Pro 560X 3677

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95−100 +150%	38 −150%
1440p	100−110 +144%	41 −144%
4K	40−45 +150%	16 −150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.09	no data
1440p	1.99	no data
4K	4.98	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Elden Ring	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	36 +0%	36 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Valorant	46 +0%	46 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	44 +0%	44 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	46 +0%	46 +0%
Elden Ring	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 +0%	33 +0%
Metro Exodus	23 +0%	23 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	34 +0%	34 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10 +0%	10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	21 +0%	21 +0%
World of Tanks	86 +0%	86 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	31 +0%	31 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	69 +0%	69 +0%
Far Cry 5	37 +0%	37 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	26 +0%	26 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Elden Ring	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
World of Tanks	57 +0%	57 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	24 +0%	24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	19 +0%	19 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	13 +0%	13 +0%
Elden Ring	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	13 +0%	13 +0%
Metro Exodus	7 +0%	7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	26 +0%	26 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +0%	13 +0%
World of Tanks	30 +0%	30 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9 +0%	9 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Fortnite	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how GTX 1060 3 GB and Pro 560X compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 3 GB is 150% faster in 1080p
GTX 1060 3 GB is 144% faster in 1440p
GTX 1060 3 GB is 150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.94	9.56
Recency	18 August 2016	16 July 2018
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	75 Watt

GTX 1060 3 GB has a 160.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro 560X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.