Radeon HD 6670 vs GeForce GTX 1050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon HD 6670, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.08
+596%

GTX 1050 outperforms HD 6670 by a whopping 596% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389913
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.380.08
Power efficiency12.031.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP107Turks
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)19 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 has 14125% better value for money than HD 6670.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640480
Core clock speed1290 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1392 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt66 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate58.2019.20
Floating-point processing power1.862 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 2.0 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm168 mm
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI-no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support+no data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 11
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.08
+596%
HD 6670 1.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5030
+595%
HD 6670 724

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 6797
+502%
HD 6670 1130

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+600%
6−7
−600%
1440p21
+600%
3−4
−600%
4K23
+667%
3−4
−667%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+536%
16.50
−536%
1440p5.19
+536%
33.00
−536%
4K4.74
+596%
33.00
−596%
  • GTX 1050 has 536% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 has 536% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 has 596% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Elden Ring 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Counter-Strike 2 6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Metro Exodus 41
+720%
5−6
−720%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Valorant 39
+680%
5−6
−680%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+620%
5−6
−620%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Dota 2 77
+670%
10−11
−670%
Elden Ring 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Far Cry 5 56
+600%
8−9
−600%
Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Metro Exodus 26
+767%
3−4
−767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Valorant 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%
World of Tanks 250
+614%
35−40
−614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+625%
4−5
−625%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Dota 2 112
+600%
16−18
−600%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Valorant 28
+600%
4−5
−600%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Elden Ring 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
World of Tanks 90−95
+667%
12−14
−667%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Metro Exodus 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Valorant 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Elden Ring 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+700%
3−4
−700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 47
+683%
6−7
−683%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Fortnite 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

This is how GTX 1050 and HD 6670 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 is 600% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 is 600% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 is 667% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.08 1.88
Recency 25 October 2016 19 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 66 Watt

GTX 1050 has a 595.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6670, on the other hand, has 13.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Radeon HD 6670

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 5948 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 911 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.