GeForce Go 7600 vs GTX 1050

Place in the ranking	390	1309
Place by popularity	20	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.22	no data
Power efficiency	12.01	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	GP107	G73
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 October 2016 (8 years ago)	1 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	13
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	177 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	58.20	3.600
Floating-point processing power	1.862 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	40	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	300 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI	-	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	350 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.4	3.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.08
+3864%

Go 7600 0.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5030
+3861%

Go 7600 127

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	42 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
1440p	21	0−1
4K	23	0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.60	no data
1440p	5.19	no data
4K	4.74	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	11 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Elden Ring	35−40	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +4200%	1−2 −4200%
Counter-Strike 2	6 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	53 +960%	5−6 −960%
Metro Exodus	41 +4000%	1−2 −4000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +725%	4−5 −725%
Valorant	39	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	36	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Dota 2	77 +7600%	1−2 −7600%
Elden Ring	35−40	0−1
Far Cry 5	56 +833%	6−7 −833%
Fortnite	70−75 +7300%	1−2 −7300%
Forza Horizon 4	35 +600%	5−6 −600%
Grand Theft Auto V	53 +5200%	1−2 −5200%
Metro Exodus	26	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +1286%	7−8 −1286%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +700%	5−6 −700%
Valorant	50−55 +5000%	1−2 −5000%
World of Tanks	250 +1823%	12−14 −1823%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	29	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Dota 2	112 +5500%	2−3 −5500%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +733%	6−7 −733%
Forza Horizon 4	31 +520%	5−6 −520%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +1286%	7−8 −1286%
Valorant	28	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7	0−1
Elden Ring	20−22	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	7	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +4600%	2−3 −4600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12	0−1
World of Tanks	90−95 +4500%	2−3 −4500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Forza Horizon 4	18	0−1
Metro Exodus	25	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Valorant	30−35 +540%	5−6 −540%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9	0−1
Dota 2	24 +60%	14−16 −60%
Elden Ring	8−9	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	24 +60%	14−16 −60%
Metro Exodus	8−9	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 +60%	14−16 −60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Dota 2	47 +213%	14−16 −213%
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Fortnite	14−16	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	11	0−1
Valorant	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%

This is how GTX 1050 and Go 7600 compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 is 4100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 is 4600% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Go 7600 is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 is ahead in 31 test (97%)
Go 7600 is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.08	0.33
Recency	25 October 2016	1 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	90 nm

GTX 1050 has a 3863.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7600 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.