GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GTX 1050

Place in the ranking	387	474
Place by popularity	16	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.03	no data
Power efficiency	12.09	6.38
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP107	N11E-GTX-A1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 October 2016 (8 years ago)	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	768
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	58.20	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.862 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	40	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	145 mm	no data
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	300 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI	-	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2x2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.05
+42.2%

GTX 485M SLI 9.18

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 8571
+60.7%

GTX 485M SLI 5334

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 32463
+30.7%

GTX 485M SLI 24830

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	120−130 +34.8%	89 −34.8%
Full HD	42 −140%	101 +140%
1440p	22 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
4K	21 +50%	14−16 −50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.60	no data
1440p	4.95	no data
4K	5.19	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

20−22
+42.9%

14−16

−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	38 +72.7%	21−24 −72.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Battlefield 5	43 +53.6%	27−30 −53.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +36.8%	18−20 −36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +38.5%	24−27 −38.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +41%	60−65 −41%
Hitman 3	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +33.3%	50−55 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	46 +58.6%	27−30 −58.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +38.5%	24−27 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	52 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +19.7%	60−65 −19.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	49 +123%	21−24 −123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Battlefield 5	35 +25%	27−30 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +36.8%	18−20 −36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	16 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +41%	60−65 −41%
Hitman 3	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +33.3%	50−55 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	37 +27.6%	27−30 −27.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +38.5%	24−27 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +28%	24−27 −28%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +19.7%	60−65 −19.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	15 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +36.8%	18−20 −36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	23 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Forza Horizon 4	34 −79.4%	60−65 +79.4%
Hitman 3	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	26 −96.2%	50−55 +96.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −25%	24−27 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +19.7%	60−65 −19.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+38.5%

24−27

−38.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +42.1%	18−20 −42.1%
Metro Exodus	25 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +37.3%	55−60 −37.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+40%

14−16

−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Hitman 3	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +70.3%	35−40 −70.3%
Metro Exodus	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +150%	6−7 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+33.3%

9−10

−33.3%

This is how GTX 1050 and GTX 485M SLI compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 is 35% faster in 900p
GTX 485M SLI is 140% faster in 1080p
GTX 1050 is 57% faster in 1440p
GTX 1050 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 is 150% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 485M SLI is 96% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 is ahead in 67 tests (93%)
GTX 485M SLI is ahead in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.05	9.18
Recency	25 October 2016	6 January 2011
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt

GTX 1050 has a 42.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.