Radeon 820M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
520 530 540X 610 610M 660M 680M 820M 840M 860M 880M 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2019
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.42
+125%

1050 Mobile 3 GB outperforms 820M by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking451668
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.70no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameGP107Krackan Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2019 (6 years ago)2 June 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed1366 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1442 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate69.22no data
Floating-point processing power2.215 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs48no data
L1 Cache288 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width96 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1752 MHz7500 MHz
Memory bandwidth84.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+110%
10
−110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is 110% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.42 5.08
Recency 1 February 2019 2 June 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has a 124.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
Apple M1 GPU M1 GPU
vs
RX 6600M RX 6600M
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
HD 8330 HD 8330
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RTX 3080 Max-Q RTX 3080 Max-Q
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
520 OEM 520 OEM
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
Apple M4 40-core GPU M4 40 core GPU
Pro V520 Pro V520
vs
RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 75 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.