GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 439 | 27 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 11.58 | 41.25 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | GP107 | AD103 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2019 (6 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 9728 |
Core clock speed | 1366 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1442 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 45,900 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 69.22 | 515.3 |
Floating-point processing power | 2.215 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 24 | 112 |
TMUs | 48 | 304 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 304 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 76 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 84.1 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 8.9 |
DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 30−35
−470%
| 171
+470%
|
1440p | 21−24
−524%
| 131
+524%
|
4K | 12−14
−558%
| 79
+558%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 147
+0%
|
147
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 100
+0%
|
100
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 240
+0%
|
240
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 142
+0%
|
142
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 173
+0%
|
173
+0%
|
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 181
+0%
|
181
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 94
+0%
|
94
+0%
|
Valorant | 350−400
+0%
|
350−400
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 214
+0%
|
214
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 133
+0%
|
133
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 199
+0%
|
199
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 167
+0%
|
167
+0%
|
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 174
+0%
|
174
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 162
+0%
|
162
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 156
+0%
|
156
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 394
+0%
|
394
+0%
|
Valorant | 350−400
+0%
|
350−400
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 128
+0%
|
128
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 187
+0%
|
187
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 158
+0%
|
158
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 204
+0%
|
204
+0%
|
Valorant | 350−400
+0%
|
350−400
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 173
+0%
|
173
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 516
+0%
|
516
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 138
+0%
|
138
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 117
+0%
|
117
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Valorant | 485
+0%
|
485
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 95
+0%
|
95
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 151
+0%
|
151
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 87
+0%
|
87
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 164
+0%
|
164
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 88
+0%
|
88
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 314
+0%
|
314
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 172
+0%
|
172
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 82
+0%
|
82
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150
+0%
|
150
+0%
|
Valorant | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 179
+0%
|
179
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 107
+0%
|
107
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
This is how GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 470% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 524% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 558% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 11.40 | 64.97 |
Recency | 1 February 2019 | 3 January 2023 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 16 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has 60% lower power consumption.
RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 469.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.