Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Place in the ranking	336	13
Place by popularity	4	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	13.48	18.11
Power efficiency	15.10	17.59
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 October 2016 (8 years ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7900 has 34% better value for money than GTX 1050 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	6144
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	1855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	2495 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	295 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	66.82	958.1
Floating-point processing power	2.138 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	192
TMUs	48	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	280 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 15.70

PRO W7900 71.95
+358%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6321

PRO W7900 28976
+358%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	49 −349%	220−230 +349%
1440p	30 −333%	130−140 +333%
4K	26 −323%	110−120 +323%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.84 +541%	18.18 −541%
1440p	4.63 +564%	30.76 −564%
4K	5.35 +580%	36.35 −580%

GTX 1050 Ti has 541% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1050 Ti has 564% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1050 Ti has 580% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −355%	150−160 +355%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −353%	240−250 +353%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −355%	50−55 +355%
Forza Horizon 4	67 −348%	300−310 +348%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 −355%	200−210 +355%
Metro Exodus	48 −338%	210−220 +338%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −336%	170−180 +336%
Valorant	63 −344%	280−290 +344%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47 −347%	210−220 +347%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
Dota 2	90 −344%	400−450 +344%
Far Cry 5	77 −355%	350−400 +355%
Fortnite	90−95 −344%	400−450 +344%
Forza Horizon 4	50 −340%	220−230 +340%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 −355%	200−210 +355%
Grand Theft Auto V	64 −353%	290−300 +353%
Metro Exodus	32 −338%	140−150 +338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	26 −323%	110−120 +323%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18 −344%	80−85 +344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −350%	90−95 +350%
Valorant	34 −341%	150−160 +341%
World of Tanks	200−210 −337%	900−950 +337%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	39 −336%	170−180 +336%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −355%	150−160 +355%
Dota 2	125 −340%	550−600 +340%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −348%	260−270 +348%
Forza Horizon 4	43 −342%	190−200 +342%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 −355%	200−210 +355%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −331%	500−550 +331%
Valorant	53 −353%	240−250 +353%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	29 −348%	130−140 +348%
Grand Theft Auto V	29 −348%	130−140 +348%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −335%	500−550 +335%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%
World of Tanks	110−120 −339%	500−550 +339%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −355%	150−160 +355%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −339%	180−190 +339%
Forza Horizon 4	30 −333%	130−140 +333%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
Metro Exodus	29 −348%	130−140 +348%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Valorant	39 −336%	170−180 +336%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Dota 2	28 −329%	120−130 +329%
Grand Theft Auto V	28 −329%	120−130 +329%
Metro Exodus	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	31 −352%	140−150 +352%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −329%	120−130 +329%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Dota 2	63 −344%	280−290 +344%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −352%	95−100 +352%
Fortnite	18−20 −347%	85−90 +347%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −341%	75−80 +341%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Valorant	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

PRO W7900 is 349% faster in 1080p
PRO W7900 is 333% faster in 1440p
PRO W7900 is 323% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.70	71.95
Recency	25 October 2016	13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	295 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has 293.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 358.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.