Quadro K620 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Quadro K620, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.06
+184%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms K620 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking340607
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.802.75
Power efficiency15.048.82
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP107GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $189.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1050 Ti has 402% better value for money than Quadro K620.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed1291 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt41 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.8226.98
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm160 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sUp to 29 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Desktop Managementno data+
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.06
+184%
Quadro K620 5.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6321
+184%
Quadro K620 2225

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 20738
+210%
Quadro K620 6691

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 19852
+234%
Quadro K620 5941

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1050 Ti 20616
+210%
Quadro K620 6653

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+219%
16−18
−219%
1440p31
+210%
10−12
−210%
4K25
+213%
8−9
−213%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.73
+335%
11.87
−335%
1440p4.48
+323%
18.99
−323%
4K5.56
+327%
23.74
−327%
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 335% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 323% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 327% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Battlefield 5 63
+200%
21−24
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%
Fortnite 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+188%
24−27
−188%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55
+206%
18−20
−206%
Valorant 120−130
+213%
40−45
−213%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Battlefield 5 52
+189%
18−20
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+190%
70−75
−190%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Dota 2 141
+213%
45−50
−213%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%
Fortnite 65
+210%
21−24
−210%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+205%
21−24
−205%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+205%
21−24
−205%
Metro Exodus 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+213%
16−18
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Valorant 120−130
+213%
40−45
−213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+219%
16−18
−219%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Dota 2 125
+213%
40−45
−213%
Far Cry 5 36
+200%
12−14
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+221%
14−16
−221%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+200%
12−14
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Valorant 53
+194%
18−20
−194%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+221%
14−16
−221%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+185%
40−45
−185%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+190%
10−11
−190%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+204%
50−55
−204%
Valorant 150−160
+212%
50−55
−212%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+200%
12−14
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Metro Exodus 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Valorant 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 63
+200%
21−24
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+186%
7−8
−186%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11
+267%
3−4
−267%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+225%
4−5
−225%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro K620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 219% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 210% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 213% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.06 5.65
Recency 25 October 2016 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 41 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 184.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K620, on the other hand, has 82.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro K620 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 207875 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 662 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or Quadro K620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.