L4 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS
#ad 
Buy L4

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with L4, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.24
+5.3%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms L4 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348361
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.13no data
Power efficiency14.9114.75
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687424
Core clock speed1291 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt72 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82489.6
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm169 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s300.1 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1050 Ti 15.24
+5.3%
L4 14.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6327
+5.3%
L4 6006

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 20730
L4 140726
+579%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 19848
L4 117775
+493%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
1440p30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
4K26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.78no data
1440p4.63no data
4K5.35no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+8.8%
80−85
−8.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+8.8%
80−85
−8.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Fortnite 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Valorant 120−130
+13.6%
110−120
−13.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+8.8%
80−85
−8.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+6.8%
190−200
−6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Dota 2 141
+8.5%
130−140
−8.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Fortnite 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Metro Exodus 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Valorant 120−130
+13.6%
110−120
−13.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Dota 2 125
+13.6%
110−120
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Valorant 53
+6%
50−55
−6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+14%
100−105
−14%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+7.9%
140−150
−7.9%
Valorant 150−160
+11.4%
140−150
−11.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Valorant 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and L4 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 11% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 11% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.24 14.47
Recency 25 October 2016 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 72 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score.

L4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 4.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and L4.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while L4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA L4
L4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 208504 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 42 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or L4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.