1650 Ti Mobile vs 1050 Ti

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking303256
Place by popularity576
Value for money6.3518.00
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN17P-G1N18P-G62
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (7 years old)2 April 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data
Current price$207 (1.5x MSRP)$892
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 183% better value for money than GTX 1050 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1291 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.8295.04
Floating-point performance2,138 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti
16.28

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 1050 Ti by 24% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti 6312
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+23.5%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 1050 Ti by 24% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+40.3%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 1050 Ti by 40% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+32.7%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 1050 Ti by 33% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1050 Ti 50939
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+27.9%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 1050 Ti by 28% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1050 Ti 352876
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
+16.2%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 1050 Ti by 16% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−15.7%
59
+15.7%
1440p30
−46.7%
44
+46.7%
4K26
+8.3%
24
−8.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−136%
59
+136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−27.1%
61
+27.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−75%
49
+75%
Battlefield 5 63
−33.3%
84
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−69%
71
+69%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−84%
46
+84%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−55.8%
67
+55.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
−37.5%
66
+37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Hitman 3 45−50
−80.4%
83
+80.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−82.4%
62
+82.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
−54.3%
54
+54.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−110%
65
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−93.5%
60
+93.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
−15%
46
+15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−14.3%
32
+14.3%
Battlefield 5 52
−40.4%
73
+40.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 39
−48.7%
58
+48.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−44%
36
+44%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−44.2%
62
+44.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45
−37.8%
62
+37.8%
Forza Horizon 4 64
−6.3%
65−70
+6.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
−45.7%
67
+45.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−38.2%
47
+38.2%
Metro Exodus 26
−46.2%
38
+46.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−61.1%
29
+61.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−96.3%
53
+96.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
−46.9%
72
+46.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−67.7%
52
+67.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−12.5%
27
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+86.7%
15
−86.7%
Battlefield 5 51
−31.4%
67
+31.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−36%
34
+36%
Far Cry 5 36
−61.1%
58
+61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−39%
57
+39%
Forza Horizon 4 45
−51.1%
65−70
+51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−50%
39
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+40.9%
22
−40.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24
−54.2%
37
+54.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
−50%
39
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−52.4%
32
+52.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Battlefield 5 36
−41.7%
51
+41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−25.9%
30−35
+25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−25.8%
35−40
+25.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−72.7%
19
+72.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
−40%
21
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−80%
18
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−56.3%
25
+56.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Battlefield 5 18
−55.6%
28
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−30%
24−27
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 15.7% faster than GTX 1050 Ti

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 46.7% faster than GTX 1050 Ti

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 8.3% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 86.7% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 136% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 65 tests (96%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.28 20.11
Recency 25 October 2016 2 April 2020
Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 1024
Memory bandwidth 112 192
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 203047 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1351 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.