Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with Radeon Pro WX 4130, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms Pro WX 4130 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 348 | 590 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 14.04 | 8.16 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | GP107 | Baffin |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 March 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1002 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1053 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 | 42.12 |
Floating-point processing power | 2.488 TFLOPS | 1.348 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 | 16 |
TMUs | 48 | 40 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | - | + |
Ansel | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 56
+167%
| 21−24
−167%
|
1440p | 25
+178%
| 9−10
−178%
|
4K | 17
+183%
| 6−7
−183%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 59
+228%
|
18−20
−228%
|
Far Cry 5 | 47
+161%
|
18−20
−161%
|
Fortnite | 85−90
+183%
|
30−33
−183%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 62
+158%
|
24−27
−158%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 56
+167%
|
21−24
−167%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 33
+94.1%
|
16−18
−94.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 49
+172%
|
18−20
−172%
|
Dota 2 | 92
+360%
|
20−22
−360%
|
Far Cry 5 | 44
+57.1%
|
27−30
−57.1%
|
Fortnite | 76
+117%
|
35−40
−117%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 57
+138%
|
24−27
−138%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 55
+175%
|
20−22
−175%
|
Metro Exodus | 19
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 52
+6.1%
|
45−50
−6.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+118%
|
16−18
−118%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 47
+147%
|
18−20
−147%
|
World of Tanks | 190−200
+109%
|
90−95
−109%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 42
+133%
|
18−20
−133%
|
Dota 2 | 86
+330%
|
20−22
−330%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40
+42.9%
|
27−30
−42.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 43
+79.2%
|
24−27
−79.2%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 39
−25.6%
|
45−50
+25.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
+160%
|
10−11
−160%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 54
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
1440p
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+283%
|
6−7
−283%
|
Metro Exodus | 12
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 29
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
Far Cry 5 | 26
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+270%
|
10−11
−270%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 32
+167%
|
12−14
−167%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+52.9%
|
16−18
−52.9%
|
Metro Exodus | 7
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+180%
|
5−6
−180%
|
Dota 2 | 27−30
+58.8%
|
16−18
−58.8%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+181%
|
16−18
−181%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 9
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Valorant | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Fortnite | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Pro WX 4130 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 167% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 178% faster in 1440p
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 183% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 600% faster.
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4130 is 26% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (49%)
- Pro WX 4130 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 30 tests (49%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 15.26 | 5.91 |
Recency | 3 January 2017 | 1 March 2017 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 158.2% higher aggregate performance score.
Pro WX 4130, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 50% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4130 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.