Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with Quadro M5000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.22

M5000M outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9412.49
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP107GM204
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681,536
Core clock speed1493 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1051 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7693.60
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS2.995 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs4896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.22
M5000M 18.18
+19.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616
M5000M 11845
+23.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
M5000M 9228
+19.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 50514
M5000M 63738
+26.2%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 299188
M5000M 324161
+8.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−53.6%
86
+53.6%
1440p25
−8%
27−30
+8%
4K17
−5.9%
18−21
+5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 59
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%
Far Cry 5 47
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−82.3%
110−120
+82.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−51.3%
55−60
+51.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Battlefield 5 49
−20.4%
55−60
+20.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−9.1%
35−40
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 44
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−98.2%
110−120
+98.2%
Metro Exodus 19
−226%
60−65
+226%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−16.7%
45−50
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−78.8%
55−60
+78.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−168%
126
+168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Battlefield 5 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Far Cry 5 40
−5%
40−45
+5%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−163%
110−120
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−46.2%
38
+46.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Battlefield 5 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−22.5%
95−100
+22.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
−171%
18−20
+171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and M5000M compete in popular games:

  • M5000M is 54% faster in 1080p
  • M5000M is 8% faster in 1440p
  • M5000M is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 31% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M5000M is 226% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 6 tests (8%)
  • M5000M is ahead in 23 tests (32%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.22 18.18
Recency 3 January 2017 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

M5000M, on the other hand, has a 19.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro M5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 846 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 139 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.