Quadro K5100M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with Quadro K5100M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
14.66
+82.3%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms K5100M by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.995.75
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP107GK104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
Core clock speed1493 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7698.69
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS2.369 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs48128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s900 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 14.66
+82.3%
K5100M 8.04

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616
+39.8%
K5100M 6880

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 30690
+23.8%
K5100M 24795

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
+61.5%
K5100M 4793

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 50514
+62.9%
K5100M 31015

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 299188
+13518%
K5100M 2197

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+14.3%
49
−14.3%
1440p25
+108%
12−14
−108%
4K17
−70.6%
29
+70.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+119%
27−30
−119%
Far Cry 5 47
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Fortnite 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+82.4%
30−35
−82.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Dota 2 92
+207%
30−33
−207%
Far Cry 5 44
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%
Fortnite 76
+55.1%
45−50
−55.1%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+67.6%
30−35
−67.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 19
−15.8%
21−24
+15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
−26.9%
65−70
+26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+46.9%
32
−46.9%
World of Tanks 190−200
+56.8%
120−130
−56.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Dota 2 86
+187%
30−33
−187%
Far Cry 5 40
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−69.2%
65−70
+69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+100%
27−30
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Metro Exodus 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
Far Cry 5 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+100%
16−18
−100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Metro Exodus 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Dota 2 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Far Cry 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and K5100M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 14% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 108% faster in 1440p
  • K5100M is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 207% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K5100M is 69% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (44%)
  • K5100M is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 8.04
Recency 3 January 2017 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 82.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

K5100M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 864 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.