HD Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking327not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.61no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 7.0 (2012)
GPU code nameGP107Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76848
Core clock speed1493 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate77.766.300
Floating-point performanceno data15.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and HD Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7008 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5918
+4038%
HD Graphics 143

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms HD Graphics by 4038% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
+2480%
HD Graphics 300

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms HD Graphics by 2480% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while HD Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 771 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 1903 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.