Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	345	392
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.19	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.488 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel	+	no data
Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.40
+22%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.62

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
+20.9%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 +24.4%	45−50 −24.4%
1440p	25 +38.9%	18−21 −38.9%
4K	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Battlefield 5	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Far Cry 5	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +24%	50−55 −24%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +30%	30−33 −30%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Battlefield 5	49 +22.5%	40−45 −22.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	44 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +40%	30−33 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +26.7%	45−50 −26.7%
Metro Exodus	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +40%	30−33 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Battlefield 5	42 +40%	30−33 −40%
Far Cry 5	40 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Metro Exodus	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Battlefield 5	29 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Far Cry 5	26 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +23.1%	65−70 −23.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Far Cry 5	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%