Place in performance ranking	331	950
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.03
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GP107	G92
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	11 December 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	128
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	135 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	41.60
Floating-point performance	2.488 gflops	0.416 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	254 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	1640 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	52.48 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 +1020%	5−6 −1020%
1440p	25 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
4K	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +975%	4−5 −975%
Battlefield 5	59 +1080%	5−6 −1080%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +1075%	4−5 −1075%
Far Cry 5	47 +1075%	4−5 −1075%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +1140%	5−6 −1140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +1200%	3−4 −1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +1133%	3−4 −1133%
Battlefield 5	49 +1125%	4−5 −1125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
Far Cry 5	44 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +950%	4−5 −950%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +1040%	5−6 −1040%
Metro Exodus	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +950%	4−5 −950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +1075%	4−5 −1075%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Battlefield 5	42 +950%	4−5 −950%
Far Cry 5	40 +1233%	3−4 −1233%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +1167%	3−4 −1167%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +975%	4−5 −975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +1200%	2−3 −1200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +950%	2−3 −950%
Metro Exodus	12 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Battlefield 5	29 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Far Cry 5	26 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 +1250%	2−3 −1250%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4	0−1
Metro Exodus	7	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	0−1
Battlefield 5	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Far Cry 5	12 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and 8800 GTS 512 compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 1020% faster in 1080p
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 1150% faster in 1440p
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 1600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.34	1.47
Recency	3 January 2017	11 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	135 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 943.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTS 512 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.