RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.94

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38983
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.63
Power efficiency12.6344.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2018 (7 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682816
Core clock speed1152 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1417 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate68.02187.4
Floating-point processing power2.177 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4888
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 11.94
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 38.85
+225%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5337
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17358
+225%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−216%
180−190
+216%
1440p29
−210%
90−95
+210%
4K19
−216%
60−65
+216%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.61
1440pno data7.21
4Kno data10.82

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−219%
230−240
+219%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Battlefield 5 57
−216%
180−190
+216%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−219%
230−240
+219%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Far Cry 5 48
−213%
150−160
+213%
Fortnite 75−80
−220%
240−250
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 67
−213%
210−220
+213%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−217%
130−140
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Battlefield 5 48
−213%
150−160
+213%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−219%
230−240
+219%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−204%
550−600
+204%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Dota 2 98
−206%
300−310
+206%
Far Cry 5 44
−218%
140−150
+218%
Fortnite 75−80
−220%
240−250
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 61
−211%
190−200
+211%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−217%
130−140
+217%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
−216%
180−190
+216%
Metro Exodus 31
−223%
100−105
+223%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−204%
140−150
+204%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
−211%
140−150
+211%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Dota 2 94
−219%
300−310
+219%
Far Cry 5 38
−216%
120−130
+216%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−219%
150−160
+219%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−220%
80−85
+220%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−220%
240−250
+220%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−209%
300−310
+209%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−213%
350−400
+213%
Valorant 130−140
−192%
400−450
+192%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−206%
110−120
+206%
Metro Exodus 5
−220%
16−18
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Valorant 70−75
−214%
220−230
+214%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
−224%
55−60
+224%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Dota 2 46
−204%
140−150
+204%
Far Cry 5 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−225%
65−70
+225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 216% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 210% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 216% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.94 38.85
Recency 3 January 2018 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 225.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 40 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.