ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile with Radeon HD 5670, including specs and performance data.
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile outperforms ATI HD 5670 by a whopping 507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 394 | 876 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.26 |
Power efficiency | no data | 2.23 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | no data | Redwood |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | April 2018 (6 years ago) | 14 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $119 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 400 |
Core clock speed | 1366 MHz | 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1442 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 627 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 64 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 15.50 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.62 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 8 |
TMUs | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 168 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 84 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDMI | - | + |
G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Multi-Projection | + | no data |
Multi Monitor | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | no data | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 150−160
+477%
| 26
−477%
|
Full HD | 200−210
+506%
| 33
−506%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | no data | 3.61 |
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:
- Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 477% faster in 900p
- Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 506% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 12.63 | 2.08 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 MB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile has a 507.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
ATI HD 5670, on the other hand, has a 34033.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5670 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.