T400 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Place in performance ranking	357	434
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	1.38	16.46
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	21 May 2018 (5 years ago)	6 May 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price	$1118	$83

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T400 has 1093% better value for money than GTX 1050 3 GB.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1518 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	72.86	34.20

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	84.1 GB/s	80 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 3 GB 13.30
+41.9%

T400 9.37

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms T400 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 3 GB 5149
+41.9%

T400 3628

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms T400 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	13.30	9.37
Recency	21 May 2018	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt