Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Place in performance ranking	360	546
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.33	3.23
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	GP107	Polaris 12
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	21 May 2018 (6 years ago)	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199
Current price	$1118	$740 (3.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 3200 has 143% better value for money than GTX 1050 3 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	640
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	1082 MHz
Boost clock speed	1518 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	72.86	41.44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	84.1 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 3 GB 13.27
+111%

Pro WX 3200 6.30

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 3 GB 5125
+111%

Pro WX 3200 2433

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 111% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 +111%	19 −111%
4K	16−18 +100%	8 −100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Hitman 3	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Metro Exodus	24 +140%	10−11 −140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Hitman 3	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Metro Exodus	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +114%	7−8 −114%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+113%

8−9
−113%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Hitman 3	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

+120%

5−6
−120%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 +150%	2−3 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1