GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs GTS 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 with GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
3.01
+3.8%

GTS 450 outperforms 775M Mac Edition by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking784796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.56no data
Power efficiency2.292.34
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF106GK104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 September 2010 (15 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921344
Core clock speed783 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate25.0689.26
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPS2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs32112
L1 Cache256 KB112 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 (3608 data rate) MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.7 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Full HD39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
1200p27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Fortnite 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 86
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Fortnite 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Valorant 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GTS 450 and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 is 17% faster in 900p
  • GTS 450 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • GTS 450 is 13% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.01 2.90
Recency 13 September 2010 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 100 Watt

GTS 450 has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTS 450 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2903 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 450 or GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.