UHD Graphics 600 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTS 150 OEM GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 with UHD Graphics 600, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
3.98
+398%

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7231180
Place by popularitynot in top-10063
Power efficiency2.8612.21
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF116Gemini Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (14 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296
Core clock speed783 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate25.067.800
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPS0.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed902 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.73 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+350%
10
−350%
1440p4−5
+300%
1
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

God of War 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTS 450 Rev. 2 and UHD Graphics 600 compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 350% faster in 1080p
  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 300% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 35 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.98 0.80
Recency 15 March 2011 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 5 Watt

GTS 450 Rev. 2 has a 397.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2020% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 8450G Radeon HD 8450G
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
GTX 650 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
vs
GT 610 PCI GeForce GT 610 PCI
Vega 6 Embedded Radeon Vega 6 Embedded
vs
GTX 560 OEM GeForce GTX 560 OEM
GT 435M GeForce GT 435M
vs
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
HD 7570 OEM Radeon HD 7570 OEM
vs
GT 520 GeForce GT 520
RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 OEM
vs
GT 520 PCIe x1 GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
HD 8490 OEM Radeon HD 8490 OEM
vs
GT 440 GeForce GT 440
R7 M520 Radeon R7 M520
vs
GT 440 GeForce GT 440
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
210 OEM GeForce 210 OEM
vs
Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 41 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3914 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 or UHD Graphics 600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.