GeForce GT 625M vs GTS 450 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTS 150 OEM GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
620M 710A 720A 720M 800M 810M 820A 820M GT 625M GT 710M GT 720A GT 820M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 with GeForce GT 625M, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
3.98
+243%

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms 625M by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
GT 625M GT 625M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7401105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.885.94
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF116GF117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (14 years ago)1 October 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296
Core clock speed783 MHzUp to 625 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0610.00
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3216
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed902 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.73 GB/sUp to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 46 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.98 1.16
Recency 15 March 2011 1 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 15 Watt

GTS 450 Rev. 2 has a 243.1% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 625M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 606.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 625M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GeForce GT 625M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
GT 625M GeForce GT 625M
vs
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti OEM
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti OEM
vs
Radeon Next Next
GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti OEM
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700
GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti OEM
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti OEM
vs
RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 OEM
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 710A 710A
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 720A 720A
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 800M 800M
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GT 710M GT 710M
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 620M 620M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 42 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 38 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 or GeForce GT 625M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.