UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs GeForce GTS 360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
310M 315M 320M 405M G105M G210M GT 230M GT 240M GT 330M GT 335M GTS 360M ION 2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
16EU Mobile 24EU 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 32EU 32EUs (Alder Lake) 48EU 64EU 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 360M and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 360M
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 38 Watt
1.46

Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) outperforms GTS 360M by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTS 360M GTS 360M
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1000771
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.11no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT215no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
Core clock speed550 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors727 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)38 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.2757 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops413no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGAno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTS 360M 1.46
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 3.23
+121%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 360M 5522
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 9705
+75.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Full HD23
+64.3%
14
−64.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Fortnite 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Valorant 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−200%
3
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−85.3%
60−65
+85.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
Fortnite 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−250%
7
+250%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
Valorant 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−100%
8
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Valorant 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTS 360M and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 94% faster in 900p
  • GTS 360M is 64% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTS 360M is 17% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTS 360M performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) performs better in 49 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.46 3.23

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has a 121.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 360M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTS 360M
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
vs
R8 M365DX Radeon R8 M365DX
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
vs
Iris Graphics 550 Iris Graphics 550
GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
vs
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
ATI HD 5670 HD 5670
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
HD 6850M HD 6850M
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
9800M GT 9800M GT
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
8800M GTX 8800M GTX
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
FX 3600M FX 3600M
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile RTX 5070 Mobile
HD 6750M HD 6750M
vs
HD 6570 HD 6570
GTS 260M GTS 260M
vs
GTS 150 OEM GTS 150 OEM
GTS 260M GTS 260M
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GTS 260M GTS 260M
vs
Xbox XGPU-B Xbox XGPU B
GTS 260M GTS 260M
vs
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 31 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 360M or UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.