Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce GTS 360M

Place in the ranking	945	618
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.04	15.01
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GT215	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	64
Core clock speed	550 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.2757 TFLOPS	no data
Gigaflops	413	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-II	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	Up to 2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12_1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	2.1	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 360M 1.68

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.45
+224%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 360M 5522

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442
+162%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	18 −206%	55−60 +206%
Full HD	21 +16.7%	18 −16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −110%	21 +110%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −71.4%	12 +71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Dota 2	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −33.3%	16 +33.3%
Fortnite	8−9 −300%	30−35 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −70%	17 +70%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −200%	9 +200%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −182%	48 +182%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
World of Tanks	30−35 −14.7%	39 +14.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Dota 2	3−4 −833%	28 +833%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −33.3%	16 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −50%	15 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −171%	45−50 +171%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −209%	30−35 +209%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
World of Tanks	10−11 −290%	35−40 +290%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Valorant	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Valorant	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	12 +0%	12 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	10 +0%	10 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how GTS 360M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 206% faster in 900p
GTS 360M is 17% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 48 tests (75%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.68	5.45
Recency	7 January 2010	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	12 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 224.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 216.7% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 360M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.