GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs GTS 360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 360M
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 38 Watt
1.69

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms GTS 360M by a whopping 1728% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking938176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.2619.72
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT215TU106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961920
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors727 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60144.0
Floating-point processing power0.2757 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
Gigaflops413no data
ROPs848
TMUs32120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGANo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 360M 1.69
RTX 2060 Mobile 30.90
+1728%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 360M 5522
RTX 2060 Mobile 57644
+944%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18
−1567%
300−350
+1567%
Full HD21
−400%
105
+400%
1440p3−4
−2067%
65
+2067%
4K2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1200%
91
+1200%
Battlefield 5 0−1 119
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1660%
88
+1660%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5150%
105
+5150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2650%
110
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7220%
366
+7220%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
83
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1294%
223
+1294%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100
+3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1544%
148
+1544%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−568%
227
+568%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1429%
107
+1429%
Battlefield 5 0−1 105
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4150%
85
+4150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1950%
82
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−5500%
280
+5500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1125%
196
+1125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2400%
75
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1267%
123
+1267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−417%
60−65
+417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−459%
190
+459%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−614%
50
+614%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1660%
88
+1660%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1000%
66
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−488%
94
+488%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1089%
107
+1089%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−400%
60
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−11.8%
38
+11.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2533%
79
+2533%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3150%
65
+3150%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2600%
54
+2600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4100%
42
+4100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−557%
46
+557%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1300%
70
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−2233%
210
+2233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2100%
22
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 20
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 15

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−900%
30
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 246
+0%
246
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Hitman 3 28
+0%
28
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GTS 360M and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 1567% faster in 900p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 400% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 2067% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 1900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 7220% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 51 test (75%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 30.90
Recency 7 January 2010 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 115 Watt

GTS 360M has 202.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1728.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 360M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTS 360M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 30 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1606 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.