Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GTS 350M

Place in performance ranking	1057	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	23.17
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	n11e-ge1	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$479
Current price	$230	$685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 57825% better value for money than GTS 350M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	2560
CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	500 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	413.0
Floating-point performance	240 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	360	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTS 350M and Radeon RX 6700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 2000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 350M 1.05

RX 6700 XT 51.49
+4804%

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms GeForce GTS 350M by 4804% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTS 350M 407

RX 6700 XT 19885
+4786%

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms GeForce GTS 350M by 4786% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −4933%	151 +4933%
1440p	1−2 −8500%	86 +8500%
4K	1−2 −4900%	50 +4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

0−1

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Hitman 3	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Hitman 3	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Hitman 3	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

no data

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Metro Exodus	0−1	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 −4782%	8250−8300 +4782%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −4778%	8000−8050 +4778%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −4784%	6300−6350 +4784%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	144 −4796%	7050−7100 +4796%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −4778%	8000−8050 +4778%
Metro Exodus	73 −4763%	3550−3600 +4763%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

125

−4780%

6100−6150
+4780%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 −4762%	5300−5350 +4762%
Metro Exodus	123 −4778%	6000−6050 +4778%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	173 −4784%	8450−8500 +4784%
Watch Dogs: Legion	62 −4739%	3000−3050 +4739%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −4718%	2650−2700 +4718%
Hitman 3	48 −4796%	2350−2400 +4796%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 −4725%	2750−2800 +4725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −4765%	3600−3650 +4765%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	25 −4700%	1200−1250 +4700%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −4768%	3700−3750 +4768%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 −4757%	1700−1750 +4757%

This is how GTS 350M and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 4933% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 8500% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 4900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.05	51.49
Recency	7 January 2010	3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	230 Watt