Radeon Instinct MI60 vs GeForce GTS 350M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTS 350M with Radeon Instinct MI60, including specs and performance data.
MI60 outperforms GTS 350M by a whopping 2962% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1171 | 234 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.48 | 7.09 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GT215 | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) | 18 November 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 727 million | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 16.00 | 460.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.24 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 360 | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 32 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | Up to 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 1,024 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−2900%
|
180−190
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2900%
|
270−280
+2900%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−2803%
|
900−950
+2803%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−2943%
|
700−750
+2943%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−2757%
|
400−450
+2757%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−2900%
|
180−190
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2900%
|
270−280
+2900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−2900%
|
180−190
+2900%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−2803%
|
900−950
+2803%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−2757%
|
400−450
+2757%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−2900%
|
180−190
+2900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2900%
|
270−280
+2900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−2900%
|
180−190
+2900%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−2803%
|
900−950
+2803%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2900%
|
270−280
+2900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−2900%
|
450−500
+2900%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.86 | 26.33 |
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 18 November 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 300 Watt |
GTS 350M has 971.4% lower power consumption.
Instinct MI60, on the other hand, has a 2961.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 350M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTS 350M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI60 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
