Radeon 610M vs GeForce GTS 350M

Place in the ranking	1085	784
Place by popularity	not in top-100	37
Power efficiency	2.60	13.16
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GT215	Dragon Range
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	128
Core clock speed	500 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	17.60
Floating-point processing power	0.24 TFLOPS	0.5632 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	360	no data
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	32	8
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	Up to 2000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 350M 1.05

Radeon 610M 2.85
+171%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 350M 407

Radeon 610M 1099
+170%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −225%	13 +225%
1440p	21−24 −190%	61 +190%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	14−16
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −21.9%	35−40 +21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	14−16
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −100%	14 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −21.9%	35−40 +21.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	14−16
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +57.1%	7 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −21.9%	35−40 +21.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−600%

7−8
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how GTS 350M and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

Radeon 610M is 225% faster in 1080p
Radeon 610M is 190% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTS 350M is 57% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 610M is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTS 350M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Radeon 610M is ahead in 41 test (77%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.05	2.85
Recency	7 January 2010	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 610M has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 350M is a notebook card while Radeon 610M is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.