Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GTS 250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTS 150 OEM GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 250 with Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GTS 250
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.34
+22.9%

GTS 250 outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTS 250 GTS 250
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10441119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG92Bno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 March 2009 (16 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128736
Core clock speed738 MHz655 / 600 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate44.93no data
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs64no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.0no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.34 1.09
Recency 4 March 2009 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm

GTS 250 has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTS 250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 250 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GTS 250
AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
HD 6570 Radeon HD 6570
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
vs
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
GT 130 OEM GeForce GT 130 OEM
vs
9800 GT Rebrand GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GT 130 OEM GeForce GT 130 OEM
vs
E9175 PCIe Radeon E9175 PCIe
GT 140 OEM GeForce GT 140 OEM
vs
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
GTS 150 OEM GeForce GTS 150 OEM
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
ATI HD 4350 Radeon HD 4350
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
HD 7970M X2 Radeon HD 7970M X2
GT 120 Mac Edition GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
vs
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
R7 M360 Radeon R7 M360
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 1784 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G HD 7550M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 250 or Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.