UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce GTS 150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GTS 9800S GTS 150M GTS 160M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 150M with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

GTS 150M
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 45 Watt
1.13

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms GTS 150M by a whopping 370% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTS 150M GTS 150M
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1049599
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiency1.9928.07
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG94Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (16 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64256
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.8026.40
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
Gigaflops192no data
ROPs168
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedUp to 800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGAMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTS 150M 1.13
UHD Graphics 770 5.31
+370%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 150M 504
UHD Graphics 770 1016
+102%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−500%
18
+500%
4K2−3
−550%
13
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−450%
11
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10
+233%
Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Valorant 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−243%
95−100
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Dota 2 16−18
−169%
43
+169%
Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−800%
9
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Valorant 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Dota 2 16−18
−150%
40
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Valorant 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−208%
35−40
+208%
Valorant 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Dota 2 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTS 150M and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 500% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 2300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 44 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.13 5.31
Recency 3 March 2009 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 369.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 150M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 150M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
GeForce GTS 150M
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 150M GeForce GTS 150M
vs
HD 6540G2 Radeon HD 6540G2
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
RX 550X Radeon RX 550X
GTS 150M GeForce GTS 150M
vs
ATI Mobility Mobility Radeon
RX 7700S 7700S
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
vs
Pro 570 Radeon Pro 570
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
vs
HD 6970 Radeon HD 6970
GTX 745 OEM GTX 745 OEM
vs
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 610
vs
Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Graphics 6100
RX 6650 XT 6650 XT
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
RTX 3090 Ti GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
vs
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
vs
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1312 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 150M or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.